<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Paul Melancon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulmelancon.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulmelancon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:06:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What happened in Peru? (part 8) by admin</title>
		<link>http://paulmelancon.com/blog/what-happened-in-peru-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmelancon.com/?p=848#comment-722</guid>
		<description>AAAGH! She&#039;s chasing me wherever I go!

(and thank you, Paige.)  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AAAGH! She&#8217;s chasing me wherever I go!</p>
<p>(and thank you, Paige.)  <img src='http://paulmelancon.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What happened in Peru? (part 8) by Paige</title>
		<link>http://paulmelancon.com/blog/what-happened-in-peru-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Paige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmelancon.com/?p=848#comment-717</guid>
		<description>holy shite that was beautifully written. Book please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holy shite that was beautifully written. Book please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You there! Yes, you! Advice, please! by admin</title>
		<link>http://paulmelancon.com/blog/you-there-yes-you-advice-please/comment-page-1/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 03:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmelancon.com/?p=831#comment-695</guid>
		<description>No, I get it and I appreciate the tips. I suppose I chose the wrong word in &quot;community&quot; as god knows I don&#039;t have the patience to manage something along those lines (and more power to you for having managed it yourself). Just a sense for people who come that the response they get is actually personal, not some intern?  I don&#039;t know. I am, perhaps, over thinking the whole thing. I do tend to instinctively want to create from whole cloth what can only really grow organically. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I get it and I appreciate the tips. I suppose I chose the wrong word in &#8220;community&#8221; as god knows I don&#8217;t have the patience to manage something along those lines (and more power to you for having managed it yourself). Just a sense for people who come that the response they get is actually personal, not some intern?  I don&#8217;t know. I am, perhaps, over thinking the whole thing. I do tend to instinctively want to create from whole cloth what can only really grow organically. <img src='http://paulmelancon.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What happened in Peru? (part 8) by admin</title>
		<link>http://paulmelancon.com/blog/what-happened-in-peru-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 02:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmelancon.com/?p=848#comment-694</guid>
		<description>aw, thanks Kristyn! Thanks for READING it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aw, thanks Kristyn! Thanks for READING it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What happened in Peru? (part 8) by Kristyn</title>
		<link>http://paulmelancon.com/blog/what-happened-in-peru-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmelancon.com/?p=848#comment-692</guid>
		<description>This is beautiful. Thank you for sharing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is beautiful. Thank you for sharing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You there! Yes, you! Advice, please! by David P.</title>
		<link>http://paulmelancon.com/blog/you-there-yes-you-advice-please/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>David P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmelancon.com/?p=831#comment-675</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got the right curmudgeon.  Having run a messageboard since 2004, I&#039;ve discovered that a sense of community has more to do with collecting people who will post. You can have 100 happy visitors to your site, and only 3 who post anything. Of those 3, only one will post something more than two words such as &quot;I agree.&quot; If you are lucky enough to get someone who is offended and rattles off some vitriol in their post, you might have a dozen other people band together, become friends and chastise the negative person in the process It&#039;s just the nature of how people behave online. 

I&#039;m not suggesting you pimp your site out and be like the thousands of annoying people who drop into random discussions only so they can hype (spam) links to their site. I am suggesting that to achieve a sense of community, you need to statistically make it more likely by 1) attracting NEW listeners/visitors who are more vocal and thought provoking. 2) making it as easy as possible for the converted fans to find you and come back. Ultimately though, only two things really drive discussions online. That would be &quot;news&quot; and &quot;controversy&quot;. Discussions fizzle quickly unless you are bringing information that means something to the reader. 

If you say &quot;Joe Smith is going to be a guest musician at our next show&quot;, chances are that people will put that on their calendar and not come back. If you say &quot;We are going to have a mystery guest musician at out next show&quot;, people have a reason to come back and talk. 

I&#039;m not sure how and when you post content updates, but I wouldn&#039;t do like another band and post a full album up for streaming. I would post maybe a few popular ones and maybe rotating songs every three weeks so people have a reason to bookmark your page and come back. I know that sounds manipulative, but it&#039;s also  adds a sense of mystery and revelation. It&#039;s no different than the reason people read a book. They don&#039;t necessarily want the ending revealed, they want the roller coaster ride. 

I think an email list is a very bad idea. With spam being a multi-billion dollar problem worldwide, I think everyone should avoid using it as a mass communication method. RSS solves every problem that email lists had. The problem is that most people don&#039;t understand the power of how to use it or what it even is. If you have an RSS link I can plug the link into Thunderbird (the email program I use) and every time you update the feed on your site (or your site can do it automatically), I will get an update just like an email. In other words, I can opt in and opt out on my own. Your fans don&#039;t have to worry about some trojan app hijacking your software and turning your computer into a spambot sending out spam to everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got the right curmudgeon.  Having run a messageboard since 2004, I&#8217;ve discovered that a sense of community has more to do with collecting people who will post. You can have 100 happy visitors to your site, and only 3 who post anything. Of those 3, only one will post something more than two words such as &#8220;I agree.&#8221; If you are lucky enough to get someone who is offended and rattles off some vitriol in their post, you might have a dozen other people band together, become friends and chastise the negative person in the process It&#8217;s just the nature of how people behave online. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting you pimp your site out and be like the thousands of annoying people who drop into random discussions only so they can hype (spam) links to their site. I am suggesting that to achieve a sense of community, you need to statistically make it more likely by 1) attracting NEW listeners/visitors who are more vocal and thought provoking. 2) making it as easy as possible for the converted fans to find you and come back. Ultimately though, only two things really drive discussions online. That would be &#8220;news&#8221; and &#8220;controversy&#8221;. Discussions fizzle quickly unless you are bringing information that means something to the reader. </p>
<p>If you say &#8220;Joe Smith is going to be a guest musician at our next show&#8221;, chances are that people will put that on their calendar and not come back. If you say &#8220;We are going to have a mystery guest musician at out next show&#8221;, people have a reason to come back and talk. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how and when you post content updates, but I wouldn&#8217;t do like another band and post a full album up for streaming. I would post maybe a few popular ones and maybe rotating songs every three weeks so people have a reason to bookmark your page and come back. I know that sounds manipulative, but it&#8217;s also  adds a sense of mystery and revelation. It&#8217;s no different than the reason people read a book. They don&#8217;t necessarily want the ending revealed, they want the roller coaster ride. </p>
<p>I think an email list is a very bad idea. With spam being a multi-billion dollar problem worldwide, I think everyone should avoid using it as a mass communication method. RSS solves every problem that email lists had. The problem is that most people don&#8217;t understand the power of how to use it or what it even is. If you have an RSS link I can plug the link into Thunderbird (the email program I use) and every time you update the feed on your site (or your site can do it automatically), I will get an update just like an email. In other words, I can opt in and opt out on my own. Your fans don&#8217;t have to worry about some trojan app hijacking your software and turning your computer into a spambot sending out spam to everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You there! Yes, you! Advice, please! by admin</title>
		<link>http://paulmelancon.com/blog/you-there-yes-you-advice-please/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 03:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmelancon.com/?p=831#comment-664</guid>
		<description>Jimmy: Yeah, that was more or less how I tried to manage things before, trying to point everyone towards the email list. After all the time away, though, I think my email list is fairly suspect. Still, it&#039;s good to know that&#039;s more or less still the best thing to do. 

I haven&#039;t really looked at MailChimp before. I used FanBridge and was relatively happy with it (though I found it when I didn&#039;t really have a big need for it). My main curiosity is which one is best for sending Facebook visitors, etc. over to the list. I don&#039;t know if you&#039;ve got a specific opinion about that, though it&#039;d probably be easiest if I just went and saw what you were already using. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy: Yeah, that was more or less how I tried to manage things before, trying to point everyone towards the email list. After all the time away, though, I think my email list is fairly suspect. Still, it&#8217;s good to know that&#8217;s more or less still the best thing to do. </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t really looked at MailChimp before. I used FanBridge and was relatively happy with it (though I found it when I didn&#8217;t really have a big need for it). My main curiosity is which one is best for sending Facebook visitors, etc. over to the list. I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve got a specific opinion about that, though it&#8217;d probably be easiest if I just went and saw what you were already using. <img src='http://paulmelancon.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You there! Yes, you! Advice, please! by admin</title>
		<link>http://paulmelancon.com/blog/you-there-yes-you-advice-please/comment-page-1/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 03:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmelancon.com/?p=831#comment-663</guid>
		<description>David: Everything you said became suspect when you called me a &quot;famous celebrity.&quot; :)  

There&#039;s a middle line, somewhere... I know maybe a little too much about the optimization side of things, actually, and I get what you&#039;re saying. I try to do a little of that but at the same time I don&#039;t want to spend much time being beholden to it. I&#039;m not so much concerned with driving visitors as I am in doing something that&#039;s interesting and has even a little sense of community to it. So what I&#039;m asking wasn&#039;t so much about &quot;how do I get more people to find me&quot; as it was &quot;how do I make the connection feel like something more than just repetitive show announcements.&quot; But I appreciate the other advice and understand how much it could damage your status as an online curmudgeon.

(Unless this is a different David, in which case disregard that)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: Everything you said became suspect when you called me a &#8220;famous celebrity.&#8221; <img src='http://paulmelancon.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a middle line, somewhere&#8230; I know maybe a little too much about the optimization side of things, actually, and I get what you&#8217;re saying. I try to do a little of that but at the same time I don&#8217;t want to spend much time being beholden to it. I&#8217;m not so much concerned with driving visitors as I am in doing something that&#8217;s interesting and has even a little sense of community to it. So what I&#8217;m asking wasn&#8217;t so much about &#8220;how do I get more people to find me&#8221; as it was &#8220;how do I make the connection feel like something more than just repetitive show announcements.&#8221; But I appreciate the other advice and understand how much it could damage your status as an online curmudgeon.</p>
<p>(Unless this is a different David, in which case disregard that)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You there! Yes, you! Advice, please! by Jimmy Ether</title>
		<link>http://paulmelancon.com/blog/you-there-yes-you-advice-please/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Ether</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 02:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmelancon.com/?p=831#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Funnel everyone to an email list you can manage on something like Mailchimp. It&#039;s the only way to assure you will get through to people over the long haul. You have control over a list, not over social networks. But you should still mirror more important posts to all the social sites for good measure.

For example though, people who&#039;ve liked you on Facebook won&#039;t necessarily see your posts if they haven&#039;t commented or liked your posts regularly. They are even less likely to see a Twitter post unless they are reading when you post it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funnel everyone to an email list you can manage on something like Mailchimp. It&#8217;s the only way to assure you will get through to people over the long haul. You have control over a list, not over social networks. But you should still mirror more important posts to all the social sites for good measure.</p>
<p>For example though, people who&#8217;ve liked you on Facebook won&#8217;t necessarily see your posts if they haven&#8217;t commented or liked your posts regularly. They are even less likely to see a Twitter post unless they are reading when you post it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You there! Yes, you! Advice, please! by David P.</title>
		<link>http://paulmelancon.com/blog/you-there-yes-you-advice-please/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>David P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 00:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmelancon.com/?p=831#comment-661</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s best to have one central source for information. Blogs allow interaction. The social networks should work like a funnel to lead people here. Facebook is destined to collapse. It&#039;s a fad. You just need a pointer at the social network sites just so people can find you.  Check on them to add friends, but I wouldn&#039;t really feel obligated to participate daily. You are a famous celebrity. You don&#039;t have time to write those songs and socialize all day.  :)  

Twitter works best when used as an RSS feed.  It&#039;s better as a &quot;Hey, I updated my blog&quot; announcement.  Most MySpace pages I have seen are giving people links to elsewhere. It&#039;s dead. Google+ has an uphill battle despite a seemingly successful start. I post on messageboards and put a link in my sig file back to my web page. Google ranks a web page higher if you have a lot of cross domain links back to your site. Your chances of grabbing stray web hits increases if your posts include both common and uncommon words mixed. 

If you talk about Spider-man and chances are your posts won&#039;t get in the top 10,000 search results. Talk about Spider-man and Rocket Racer and you&#039;ll get a top twenty search engine result from people doing very specific searches. 

Think about what topics people are going to search for and post blogs about that. Pay particular attention to the noun combinations you use. You can still be candid and write blog posts that will get noticed on Google. 

BTW, not sure if you intended on your Supertramp cover tune to be downloadable, but it is. I suggest you use a service with better security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s best to have one central source for information. Blogs allow interaction. The social networks should work like a funnel to lead people here. Facebook is destined to collapse. It&#8217;s a fad. You just need a pointer at the social network sites just so people can find you.  Check on them to add friends, but I wouldn&#8217;t really feel obligated to participate daily. You are a famous celebrity. You don&#8217;t have time to write those songs and socialize all day.  <img src='http://paulmelancon.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>Twitter works best when used as an RSS feed.  It&#8217;s better as a &#8220;Hey, I updated my blog&#8221; announcement.  Most MySpace pages I have seen are giving people links to elsewhere. It&#8217;s dead. Google+ has an uphill battle despite a seemingly successful start. I post on messageboards and put a link in my sig file back to my web page. Google ranks a web page higher if you have a lot of cross domain links back to your site. Your chances of grabbing stray web hits increases if your posts include both common and uncommon words mixed. </p>
<p>If you talk about Spider-man and chances are your posts won&#8217;t get in the top 10,000 search results. Talk about Spider-man and Rocket Racer and you&#8217;ll get a top twenty search engine result from people doing very specific searches. </p>
<p>Think about what topics people are going to search for and post blogs about that. Pay particular attention to the noun combinations you use. You can still be candid and write blog posts that will get noticed on Google. </p>
<p>BTW, not sure if you intended on your Supertramp cover tune to be downloadable, but it is. I suggest you use a service with better security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

